Choose language:

News

02
High Court confirms no limitation of liability for wreck removal costs

Published on 2026/07/02

Maritime Legal Update – July 2026

Australia: High Court confirms no limitation of liability for wreck removal costs

(prepared by Marek Czernis & Co. Law Office)

Firm note – limitation of liability, wreck removal and port claims

The Law Office actively advises shipowners, ports, terminals, P&I Clubs, insurers and financing institutions regarding: limitation of liability, wreck removal claims,nport liability, casualty response, pollution claims, marine insurance and disputes arising from maritime casualties.

The Law Office participated in and supported one of the parties involved in the dispute discussed in this judgment, particularly in relation to limitation of liability issues, interpretation of the LLMC 1976 Convention and claims concerning wreck removal and pollution response.

1. Introduction – CSL Australia Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd

In CSL Australia Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd [2026] HCA 15, the High Court of Australia delivered one of the most important recent judgments concerning limitation of liability for wreck removal claims.  

The judgment concludes long-running litigation arising from the collision involving MV Goliath and two harbour tugs in Devonport, Tasmania.  

2. Background

In January 2022 MV Goliath collided with the tugs: York Cove, Campbell Cove, causing both vessels to sink and resulting in fuel pollution within the Mersey River.  

TasPorts sought recovery of: wreck removal costs, pollution response costs, salvage-related expenses and other consequential losses.  

The total claims exceeded AUD 20 million.  

3. The legal issue

The central question was whether the shipowner could limit liability under the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 (LLMC 1976). CSL argued that the claims should be subject to limitation. TasPorts maintained that Australia had exercised its right to exclude wreck removal claims from limitation.  

4. LLMC and Australia’s reservation

Australia exercised its reservation under Article 18(1) excluding the application of Article 2(1)(d) which concerns claims relating to the raising, removal, destruction or rendering harmless of wrecks.   The dispute focused on whether such claims could nevertheless remain limitable through another category within Article 2.

5. High Court decision

The High Court unanimously dismissed CSL’s appeal.  The Court held that where a claim falls within the wreck removal category, it remains excluded from limitation regardless of whether it may also fall within another category of maritime claim.  Accordingly wreck removal costs are not subject to limitation under Australian law.  

6. International significance

The High Court relied upon authorities from: Hong Kong, the Netherlands and other jurisdictions applying the LLMC Convention.  

The judgment reinforces the importance of maintaining consistency in the international interpretation of maritime conventions.

7. Practical implications

The decision significantly increases exposure for shipowners in relation to: wreck removal, environmental response costs, salvage operations and claims brought by port authorities.

For ports and terminals, the judgment strengthens the ability to recover the full costs associated with maritime casualties.  

The decision will also be highly relevant for: P&I Clubs, insurers, maritime financiers and port operators.

8. Law Office conclusions

The judgment in CSL Australia Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd [2026] HCA 15 is one of the most significant recent decisions concerning limitation of liability in maritime law.

The Court confirmed that: reservations made under the LLMC Convention must be interpreted strictly, wreck removal claims may fall entirely outside the limitation regime and shipowners and insurers must account for the possibility of full liability exposure.

The decision serves as an important reminder that the financial consequences of major port casualties may extend well beyond the limits available for other maritime claims.  

Final note – our publications

Further insights regarding maritime law, limitation of liability, casualty response and marine insurance are available at:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/czernis

https://x.com/MCLO_LAWOFFICE